It has been three and half years since I migrated to George
Fox and during this time I have discovered a trend on campus. It caught my
attention in my general psychology class freshman year and has particularly
manifested itself when I serving as an ARC consultant.
Personally, I find this sad, for I have come to love this
method of presenting information. However, I know most students only get one or
two encounters with APA during college, which is not enough to master it. Still,
I would like to take a minute to defend APA and explain in part why it behaves
the way it does.
First off, do you know what APA stands for? No, not a
torture device. It stands for the American Psychological Association. This
means APA style was created by psychologists for psychologists. It was not made
with Lit majors in mind or even aspiring elementary teachers. In fact, many of
the qualities that separate APA from MLA can be explained by the goals of the
discipline that developed it.
For a psychologist, the bulk of the writing one encounters
and crafts are research reports and journal articles. Therefore, APA style is
particularly suited for these. The idea was to create a strict system so that
researchers could easily present their findings. If everyone must report in the
same fashion then I will know exactly where to find your results or method
sections. This explains why APA has so many rules.
Another example of APA catering to journal articles lies in
the in-text citations. If one
paraphrases or summarizes an article then he or she does not have to put page numbers in the in-text
citation. Journal articles are normally short, which means if you want to look
up the concept cited you might as well read the whole article. And then there
are the doi numbers that gives so many students head aches. Yes, they are
important. They are the best identification system for pulling up articles on
the web.
But wait. What about books? Books are normally discouraged
from use in papers and reports for several reasons. One, books don’t have to be
peer reviewed where as journals do. Second, psychology is changing so fast that
old books are only useful if you are writing about a particular old theory
(normally the flaws of it) or a dead psychologist. The most current information
about psychology in our internet saturated age is on the web in the form of
peer reviewed journals, or textbooks that are constantly being upgraded.
I hope this gives a small explanation for why APA is
different. Don’t worry. If you are not a psychologist you probably won’t have
to submit to the APA very often. (Unless you are a business major. Don’t ask me
why on that one). All in all, if practiced and used for articles, APA makes a
lot of sense in the long run.
For details on APA and other styles, go to http://www.georgefox.edu/arc/Style%20Guides.html.

No comments:
Post a Comment